Crypus
Crypus
Defi - trading BTC - ETH
999Following
1.1Kfollowers
Feed
Feed
At this age, I should only need to play, eat well, and be carefree.
But instead, I have to take care of every meal like an adult.
Crypus
Gm @wcthub 💚
WalletConnect Pay is wanted in Vietnam 🇻🇳
Today I stopped by a nearby WinMart and quickly asked the sales clerk about the payment system at the counter.
At checkout, I asked:
-> What payment methods does the store currently accept?
-> He said the store currently accepts cash, bank transfers, card payments, and QR payments. He also showed me the POS machine D210, which has a BIDV payment sticker.
I asked further:
-> Has the store ever considered accepting payments with Bitcoin/USDC before? If in the future it’s possible to scan crypto to pay as simply as scanning a QR code, what do you think?
-> He said if it works, is easy to use, and doesn’t slow down the checkout process, that would be convenient. The seller just needs the customer to pay quickly, with clear and uncomplicated steps.
What I liked was that the sales clerk was very friendly. When I asked about the POS machine, he even took the initiative to hold the device and film clearly to show the device’s angle and introduced it enthusiastically.
Actually, many people outside of Web3 nowadays no longer find crypto too unfamiliar.
What they need is just a payment experience that is simple enough, familiar, and easy to use—like how they swipe cards or scan QR codes every day.
@WalletConnect
Gm @wcthub 💚
WalletConnect Pay is wanted in Vietnam 🇻🇳
Today I stopped by a nearby WinMart and quickly asked the sales clerk about the payment system at the counter.
At checkout, I asked:
-> What payment methods does the store currently accept?
-> He said the store currently accepts cash, bank transfers, card payments, and QR payments. He also showed me the POS machine D210, which has a BIDV payment sticker.
I asked further:
-> Has the store ever considered accepting payments with Bitcoin/USDC before? If in the future it’s possible to scan crypto to pay as simply as scanning a QR code, what do you think?
-> He said if it works, is easy to use, and doesn’t slow down the checkout process, that would be convenient. The seller just needs the customer to pay quickly, with clear and uncomplicated steps.
What I liked was that the sales clerk was very friendly. When I asked about the POS machine, he even took the initiative to hold the device and film clearly to show the device’s angle and introduced it enthusiastically.
Actually, many people outside of Web3 nowadays no longer find crypto too unfamiliar.
What they need is just a payment experience that is simple enough, familiar, and easy to use—like how they swipe cards or scan QR codes every day.
@WalletConnect
The sensible country kids always help their parents. So adorable 🤣🤣🤣
Crypus
Institutional adoption should not be judged by the number of logos on announcements.
We must look at what each organization represents in the financial system.
With @zksync, the proof points are quite clear:
-> Cari Network
5 U.S. regional banks, over $600B in deposits, founded by Eugene Ludwig, 27th U.S. Comptroller of the Currency.
This is not a random crypto founder. This is someone who has been in a position to deeply understand what banks need before moving financial workflows to new infrastructure: privacy, compliance, control, and verifiable settlement.
-> BitGo
Institutional custody is integrated with Prividium. For institutional funds, custody is not a side feature. It is a major layer of trust.
-> Deutsche Bank
Memento ZK Chain shows that large financial institutions are seriously exploring the use of ZK infrastructure for private environments.
-> ADI Chain
Live with First Abu Dhabi Bank. Institutional adoption only truly matters when there is a running system, not just slides.
-> 35+ institutions actively evaluating
If this number continues to grow, the story is no longer about a few isolated cases. It starts to look like a forming network.
And networks in finance do not grow linearly.
A new institution does not just add 1 user.
It adds a possible new counterparty for the entire rest of the network.
-> 10 institutions create 45 possible connections
-> 100 institutions create 4,950 possible connections
This is how large financial networks grow. SWIFT or Visa don’t scale because of a single participant, but because each new participant makes the network more useful for all other participants.
In this context, $ZK should be understood correctly in its current role.
Not as price talk.
-> $ZK is the only native asset of the ZKsync network
-> $ZK is the governance token for network-level decisions such as protocol upgrades, fee structures, and economic parameters
-> $ZK is the native gas token for ZKsync Gateway, the layer that aggregates transactions from ZKsync chains and Prividium zones before posting to Ethereum L1
-> $ZK has a fixed supply of 21B and no inflation
Any changes to economic functions, if any, will depend on governance and should not be speculated on prematurely.
If institutions are building on the same network, then $ZK should be viewed in the context of network architecture, not as a standalone ticker.
Crypus reposted

Most people still use X just for scrolling.But if you’ve already built a real audience of 1K+ followers, your account is more than just a feed — it’s time to turn your influence into real income.
Join creator tasks through @MagVerse_AI and let your content start earning for you.
🔗:
Content-to-Earn is becoming real.

Miu Lê is working with the police regarding the alleged illegal use of drugs in Cat Hai, Hai Phong.
According to initial information, authorities checked a group of 6 people and rapid tests showed that Miu Lê and 2 others tested positive for drugs.
The case is still under investigation and clarification.
From "Fairy Dream" to this news, it really is shocking.

It seems we won't be hearing Miu Lê sing for a long time anymore.
Does anyone know about this?

Crypus
Institutional adoption should not be judged by the number of logos on announcements.
We must look at what each organization represents in the financial system.
With @zksync, the proof points are quite clear:
-> Cari Network
5 U.S. regional banks, over $600B in deposits, founded by Eugene Ludwig, 27th U.S. Comptroller of the Currency.
This is not a random crypto founder. This is someone who has been in a position to deeply understand what banks need before moving financial workflows to new infrastructure: privacy, compliance, control, and verifiable settlement.
-> BitGo
Institutional custody is integrated with Prividium. For institutional funds, custody is not a side feature. It is a major layer of trust.
-> Deutsche Bank
Memento ZK Chain shows that large financial institutions are seriously exploring the use of ZK infrastructure for private environments.
-> ADI Chain
Live with First Abu Dhabi Bank. Institutional adoption only truly matters when there is a running system, not just slides.
-> 35+ institutions actively evaluating
If this number continues to grow, the story is no longer about a few isolated cases. It starts to look like a forming network.
And networks in finance do not grow linearly.
A new institution does not just add 1 user.
It adds a possible new counterparty for the entire rest of the network.
-> 10 institutions create 45 possible connections
-> 100 institutions create 4,950 possible connections
This is how large financial networks grow. SWIFT or Visa don’t scale because of a single participant, but because each new participant makes the network more useful for all other participants.
In this context, $ZK should be understood correctly in its current role.
Not as price talk.
-> $ZK is the only native asset of the ZKsync network
-> $ZK is the governance token for network-level decisions such as protocol upgrades, fee structures, and economic parameters
-> $ZK is the native gas token for ZKsync Gateway, the layer that aggregates transactions from ZKsync chains and Prividium zones before posting to Ethereum L1
-> $ZK has a fixed supply of 21B and no inflation
Any changes to economic functions, if any, will depend on governance and should not be speculated on prematurely.
If institutions are building on the same network, then $ZK should be viewed in the context of network architecture, not as a standalone ticker.
Institutional adoption should not be judged by the number of logos on announcements.
We must look at what each organization represents in the financial system.
With @zksync, the proof points are quite clear:
-> Cari Network
5 U.S. regional banks, over $600B in deposits, founded by Eugene Ludwig, 27th U.S. Comptroller of the Currency.
This is not a random crypto founder. This is someone who has been in a position to deeply understand what banks need before moving financial workflows to new infrastructure: privacy, compliance, control, and verifiable settlement.
-> BitGo
Institutional custody is integrated with Prividium. For institutional funds, custody is not a side feature. It is a major layer of trust.
-> Deutsche Bank
Memento ZK Chain shows that large financial institutions are seriously exploring the use of ZK infrastructure for private environments.
-> ADI Chain
Live with First Abu Dhabi Bank. Institutional adoption only truly matters when there is a running system, not just slides.
-> 35+ institutions actively evaluating
If this number continues to grow, the story is no longer about a few isolated cases. It starts to look like a forming network.
And networks in finance do not grow linearly.
A new institution does not just add 1 user.
It adds a possible new counterparty for the entire rest of the network.
-> 10 institutions create 45 possible connections
-> 100 institutions create 4,950 possible connections
This is how large financial networks grow. SWIFT or Visa don’t scale because of a single participant, but because each new participant makes the network more useful for all other participants.
In this context, $ZK should be understood correctly in its current role.
Not as price talk.
-> $ZK is the only native asset of the ZKsync network
-> $ZK is the governance token for network-level decisions such as protocol upgrades, fee structures, and economic parameters
-> $ZK is the native gas token for ZKsync Gateway, the layer that aggregates transactions from ZKsync chains and Prividium zones before posting to Ethereum L1
-> $ZK has a fixed supply of 21B and no inflation
Any changes to economic functions, if any, will depend on governance and should not be speculated on prematurely.
If institutions are building on the same network, then $ZK should be viewed in the context of network architecture, not as a standalone ticker.
Crypus
Cross-border payments are not slow because banks don't want to innovate.
They are slow because the old system was built around a very real problem:
No one wants to fully trust someone else's ledger.
A cross-border transaction can go through many correspondent banks, many separate ledgers, and many reconciliation steps. Each party keeps its own record. Capital often has to be pre-positioned at multiple points in the payment network. Settlement can still take multiple processing and reconciliation steps.
Meanwhile, the FX market reached about 9.6T USD volume per day in April 2025 according to BIS.
The scale is huge.
The plumbing is still too old.
Public chains are strong in verifiability, but full transparency is a big issue for institutions. No bank wants transaction flows, counterparties, or risk exposure to be fully public.
Private chains offer more control, but without cryptographic settlement, it easily reverts to a "trust me" model.
This is where Prividium from @zksync deserves a close look.
Institutions can run execution and data in a private environment they control. ZK proofs and state commitments are posted on Ethereum so results can still be mathematically verified.
No need to make all transactions public.
No need to trust an intermediary operator.
What needs to be public is the proof.
What needs to be private remains private.
If TradFi truly moves onchain, the path is not to turn banks into DeFi users.
But to give them a settlement layer that is private enough, verifiable enough, controllable enough, and connected enough with counterparties/liquidity so institutional money flows can run on more modern infrastructure.
In your opinion, what is the biggest blocker for institutions to move onchain: privacy, compliance, or liquidity?
