币圈“巴菲特”
币圈“巴菲特”
8-year-old leek|2019-2021 professional shouting one-handed (ended)|spot BTC long-term holding|BTC market analysis|OKX node
681Following
1.8Kfollowers
Feed
Feed
That man is at it again! For every 25 BTC, 1 is in his hands 🏦
Let's break down these scary numbers: MicroStrategy now holds 818,869 BTC, accounting for 3.9% of the global 21 million supply cap.
Out of every 25 bitcoins worldwide, 1 lies in Saylor's vault.
And that's not even the most aggressive part.
On May 11, they again bought 535 BTC at over $80,000 each, spending about $43 million, bringing the total holding cost to approximately $61.86 billion, with an average cost of $75,540 per BTC, and a year-to-date BTC return of 9.4%.
This is no longer just an asset item on the company's financial report; it's practically a dimensionality reduction strike on Bitcoin's supply side. Saylor doesn't care if others fear a price drop and don't reduce positions; he just keeps buying, occasionally adjusting positions slightly but never changing the overall net buying trend.
With this near-mad hoarding, MicroStrategy is turning into a giant version of a Bitcoin ETF. As their holdings approach 4%, pricing power and influence will only become more exaggerated. In the future, if you want to buy the dip, you might first have to see if Saylor is still buying. In this situation, do you feel safe holding onto the big player, or are you worried about one entity dominating and messing things up? 😶🌫️
Whether this giant whale holding so much BTC single-handedly is a big positive or negative for the BTC market is up to individual interpretation!
#Strategy披露4月btc收益率6.2%
@OKX星球
$BTC


🟢 Wall Street's "open conspiracy," a show of one thing while secretly doing another?
Just as everyone is still debating whether Saylor will sell, the fund flows of US ETFs provide the most honest answer.
Data for the 19th week of 2026:
1. BTC (+$622.75 million):
This is the real trump card! Over $600 million net inflow in a single week, with trading volume breaking through 100 billion.
👉 Interpretation: Institutions don't care about Saylor's "small moves" at all; they are voting with their feet— as long as the price is right, they will keep buying without hesitation.
2. ETH (+$70.49 million):
Although not as fierce as BTC, the positive inflow shows Ethereum remains the "standard" for institutions, steadily advancing.
3. SOL (+$39.23 million):
SOL performed brilliantly this week, attracting nearly $40 million, indicating that in the high-performance public chain sector, the market is still willing to cast a vote of confidence for Solana.
On one side, listed companies are playing high-leverage capital maneuvers; on the other, traditional financial giants are frantically buying up.
In this massive capital game, as long as you haven't seen ETFs with large net outflows for two consecutive weeks or MicroStrategy stopping stock issuance, this "coin hoarding" game is far from over.
#比特币ETF:连续六周净流入
@OKX星球 @八喜Zora_OKX @可乐Cola_OKX @米妮Minnie_OKX
gala save me 🥹

$BTC Although I am fully committed to crypto🔐, it doesn't stop me from trading US and A-shares
Latest news: Sun Yuchen said:
Short-term shortage of computing power, mid-term shortage of electricity, permanent shortage of storage. If you miss out on storage, look downstream, yes, it's electricity⚡️
Among them, he highly recommends companies involved in nuclear fusion
Let's not talk about US stocks for now, let's talk about A-shares. With summer approaching, electricity demand will surge, so it's time to invest in some electricity⚡️ and "nuclear fusion" related stocks
What do you all think? Any recommendations?
Anyway, I bought "Yue Dian Li A", "Datang Power Generation", and "China 🇨🇳 Energy Construction" last week
$BTC

Saylor finally broke his silence? Is MicroStrategy's "never sell coins" myth shattered? The truth is actually crazier!
The crypto community has been buzzing these past two days with rumors that MicroStrategy might sell some Bitcoin.
Michael Saylor himself couldn’t sit still and came out to put out the fire. But the way he did it only made things look more suspicious.
Let me translate what the big boss is really saying and throw in some hardcore data so you get it 👇
1️⃣ About never selling coins: from faith to strategy
Saylor used to shout "never sell" out of personal conviction; now that the company is public, he has to answer to shareholders.
✅ The truth: They might sell a very small amount of BTC, mainly to "prepare the market" and use capital gains to pay dividends. This isn’t a sell-off or exit, it’s a "tactical adjustment."
2️⃣ About "sell 1 to buy 20": it’s a math game
Don’t be fooled by talk of selling; it’s actually to buy more!
🧮 Logic: Even if they sell 1 BTC to pay debts or dividends, as long as they can raise funds by issuing stock (like STRC), they immediately buy back 10-20 BTC.
👉 Result: The company’s total holdings increase, and BTC per share actually goes up. This move is brilliant!
3️⃣ Responding to "Ponzi scheme" accusations: I have cash flow
Facing accusations of running a "Ponzi scheme," Saylor firmly retorted: This is optimizing capital structure and leveraging market liquidity, not tricking fools to take over.
📊 Key points: How wealthy is MicroStrategy now?
Bitcoin holdings: About 818,300 BTC (nearly 4% of total supply), average cost around $75,500.
Book profit and loss: Although Q1 showed a $12.5 billion loss, they never stopped buying and added 63,000 BTC this year.
Financial ammo: Raised over $5.58 billion this year, with cash reserves enough to cover interest for the next 18 months.
💡 Summary:
Saylor hasn’t changed; he’s still betting on a long-term Bitcoin bull market.
The so-called selling is just lubrication in a high-leverage game. As long as the US stock market values him highly, he can keep "selling shares to buy coins" in an endless loop.
As for us retail investors? Follow the whales closely and watch their cash flow. As long as they don’t collapse, this accumulation wave isn’t over yet. 🐳
$BTC
#比特币ETF:连续六周净流入
#Saylor拟出售BTC以支付股息
@OKX星球 @八喜Zora_OKX @米妮Minnie_OKX @可乐Cola_OKX @米花Lilac_OKX




Brothers, let's talk about US stocks
📈 US stocks are soaring again. Is entering the market now "eating meat" or "catching the falling knife"?
Recently, the US stock market seems to be on steroids, with the Nasdaq and S&P 500 frequently hitting new all-time highs. Cutting-edge sectors like AI computing power, storage chips, Micron, AMD, SanDisk, and others are surging. In this atmosphere, two voices are particularly loud in the market:
"Dollar-cost averaging perpetual motion machine" theory: Many say, don’t fuss, just dollar-cost average into broad US stock indices. The long-term annualized return of 10%~13% is very stable, much better than random investing.
"Lying down to win QQQ" theory: Especially referring to dollar-cost averaging into QQQ (Nasdaq 100 ETF) or the lower-fee QQQM, and VOO (S&P 500 ETF). Over the past decade-plus, these have relied heavily on top global tech giants and indeed produced astonishing compound returns, becoming the "wealth code" in many people's eyes.
However, don’t just look at the juicy gains and ignore the risks. The current prices are precisely the most dangerous warning signals.
"The stock god" has exited: Buffett’s latest moves are worth pondering—Berkshire Hathaway’s cash reserves have soared to nearly $400 billion (over 50% of assets), and he continues to net sell stocks. He’d rather hold massive cash to buy short-term Treasuries than touch stocks, indicating he thinks current prices are "too expensive." Historically, every time he hoards such a high cash ratio, it’s usually followed by a market correction.
Contrarian thinking: Don’t do what many people are doing; do what many people avoid. When the whole internet is shouting "dollar-cost average US stocks for sure profit," the high prices actually mean extremely high risk.
According to historical patterns, the market urgently needs a "healthy correction" to digest the bubble. Jumping in now might mean "catching a falling knife."
Capital flow speculation: If US stocks really have problems or face a big correction, where will the outflow funds go?
Either to the crypto market or to undervalued A-shares.
These two places might now be the wrongly punished valleys.
Remember: Be fearful when others are greedy. When everyone is partying, maybe it’s time for you to calmly exit and prepare for the next cycle.
Do you think this is a reasonable way to think about 🤔 the issue?
#在OKX交易美股:三大独角兽永续合约已上线
$SPACEX $OPENAI $ANTHROPIC
@OKX中文 @OKX星球 @八喜Zora_OKX @米妮Minnie_OKX @可乐Cola_OKX @米花Lilac_OKX




Let's talk about some hidden data 📊 and opportunities in ETFs
The big BTC ETFs, these "partners in hardship," are now experiencing a severe polarization in their fortunes 😂.
On the surface, they've attracted $3.4 billion over the past six weeks, with total assets surpassing $109.3 billion, which looks impressive. But digging deeper, almost all the money has been monopolized by these two "money-eating beasts," IBIT and FBTC, which alone have taken 60% of the inflows.
IBIT aggressively bought 11,200 coins in one week, FBTC added 1,290 coins, while GBTC is still bleeding over 800 coins weekly, and the smaller ones are either stagnant or even losing.
This is not a flourishing market; it's clearly "big fish eating little fish." If this competition continues, the liquidity of those marginal ETFs might not even cover their electricity bills 💸.
Price-wise, things are a bit sneaky now; Q2 rebounded 18.2%, stuck just above 80,000.
Tom Lee says 76,000 is the bull-bear line, so now it's barely passing. But the options market is loaded with bullish bets between 85,000 and 90,000, and everyone's eyes are glued there.
If the month ends between 80,000 and 84,000, neither up nor down, people will feel frustrated: just one step away from winning, does it count as a win? No. Does it count as a loss? Also no. Pure torture 📉.
Also worth mentioning, the continuous ETF inflows coincided with the easing of US-China negotiations. It looks like a "resonant soup," but this relationship is terrifying when you think about it.
Capital is very cautious now; ARKB even slightly reduced yesterday, showing that when the signal is off, it runs faster than anyone else.
How long can these good days last? Hard to say, let's just take it step by step 🐻❄️.
Although ETF inflow and outflow info isn't very strong, it still indirectly reflects BTC's adhesion to the capital market now
#比特币ETF:连续六周净流入
@OKX中文 @OKX星球
$BTC $ETH $SOL



Bitcoin is undergoing an unprecedented policy awakening, and 2026 is destined to be a pivotal year for its transition from a fringe asset to national infrastructure.🚀
The most notable recent signal comes from the power center in Washington, where the "Clarity Act" has made substantial progress in the Senate Banking Committee. Senator Cynthia Lummis has clearly stated she will push for the bill to pass the committee's voting process on Thursday.
📊 Data shows that the bill aims to provide a clear regulatory framework for the crypto market. Once implemented, it will attract over $300 billion in institutional capital to enter compliantly, ending the current "wait-and-see" stance.
This institutional benefit is opening new valuation space for Bitcoin.
Even more striking is the Pentagon's statement: the U.S. military has just confirmed it is running a Bitcoin node. This move signifies that Bitcoin is no longer merely a financial speculative asset but has been officially incorporated into the national security toolbox.
🏛️ Combined with the upcoming testimony of Admiral Paparo, we can foresee that Bitcoin may appear in the U.S. strategic reserves in the coming years. This level of national recognition is a qualitative change that no technical analysis could have predicted in advance.
On the macro level, positive signals continue. The launch of BPI Asia means Bitcoin’s liquidity infrastructure in the Asia-Pacific region is improving, while the start of a global interest rate cut cycle will bring abundant liquidity to risk assets.
💧 Although debates around quantum technology sound cutting-edge, they essentially reflect the market’s reassessment of Bitcoin’s long-term value as digital gold.
Considering all these fundamentals, a $150,000 target is not out of reach but a rational expectation based on regulatory breakthroughs, institutional entry, and national strategic endorsement. Bitcoin is writing its history, and we are witnessing it all unfold live.📈
#CLARITY法案:标记审议最早下周启动
$BTC $ETH $SOL
@OKX星球


$BTC brothers, don’t be fooled by that horizontal line on the candlestick chart. BTC right now is like sitting on a powder keg—the surface looks calm at $80,000, but underneath are sharks cutting down the retail traders 🦈.
Just took a quick look at Coinglass data and broke out in a cold sweat. The total contract open interest across the network hit a historic high of $131.6 billion. What does that mean? It’s like the whole market is walking a tightrope, and the basis is inverted. Bears are willing to pay to hold their positions, clearly a sign that trouble is brewing ⚠️.
Look at what the whales are doing. The large holders’ long-to-short ratio has dropped to 0.48, meaning the smart money holding tens of millions doesn’t believe in a rally now. They’re quietly building short positions while retail traders are still dreaming of $90,000. The whales are already planning to dump and take profits—this is a classic wolf-eats-sheep scenario 🐺.
The future script is actually quite narrow: either the bulls get trampled, breaking through $77,500 and plunging to $75,200 to trigger liquidations, or the bears get forced out, pushing a strong breakout above $83,000 and using shorts as fuel to reach $90,000. But judging by the current funding rates, the odds of a downward move are at least 70%.
At this moment, don’t stubbornly try to catch a falling knife unless you want to pay the market fees. Conservative players are advised to just turn off their computers and watch the show. Aggressive brothers can try light short positions with a hard stop loss at $83,100.
Remember, at this crossroads of hundreds of billions in capital battles, staying alive is more important than making money. Buckle up 🎢.
$BTC $ETH
#非农数据连续超出预期:降息预期走低




Family, things are heating up, BlackRock, the old fox, has finally targeted us retail investors in the crypto space—no, actually, they're sending us money 💰.
Just now, news came that this giant managing $10 trillion officially filed documents to launch two money market funds focused on earning interest from stablecoins, BSTBL and BRSRV. Simply put, it means your USDT and USDC don’t have to hibernate in your wallet anymore; they can directly earn a 5% annual yield from U.S. Treasury bonds 📈.
Before, our U in the wallet earned zero yield, and going into DeFi for some gains risked contract vulnerabilities and being wiped out. Now, BlackRock is stepping in personally, with SEC regulation backing it, so security is top-notch. You can buy through MetaMask, earn daily compound interest automatically, and convert back to U anytime you want to exit. The liquidity is just insane 🔥.
This means Wall Street has fully recognized stablecoin users as a "loyal customer base." They’re eyeing the $316 billion fund pool greedily. Morgan Stanley followed suit last week, and Goldman Sachs and Fidelity will probably jump in next. Crypto wealth management might really become a standard part of traditional finance 🏦.
But on the flip side, Circle and Tether are under huge pressure. They used to buy U.S. Treasuries with our U to earn a 5% spread but didn’t share any of it with us. Now that BlackRock has broken this barrier, let’s see how they keep pretending to sleep. Most likely, USDC and USDT will be forced to pay interest directly to users, making us the biggest winners 😎.
This truly marks the start of the era of effortless earnings. Are you ready to move the U in your wallet?
#Tether销毁20亿USDT
$BTC $USDT $ETH
@OKX中文 @OKX星球 @八喜Zora_OKX @可乐Cola_OKX @米妮Minnie_OKX @米花Lilac_OKX


$BTC urgently needs a grand narrative in the crypto space
to drive enthusiasm for funds both on and off the market
A stagnant 💧 market will not trigger a rally
Today I saw a project called TAICIT on X, said to be a privacy protocol for BTC
I bought a few as a precaution, the crypto space really needs the next ▶️ ordi
Could this be it?
